|
Let's Keep HOPE VI alive sound familiar."
The words of a key supporter during a
crucial period when HOPE VI was set to
sunshine September 2003. The distinguished
gentleman from North Carolina the Honorable
Congressman Mel Watt (D), while praising the
HOPE VI program, to his credit acknowledged
legitimate concerns about the program. One
of the concerns that remain as a nightmare
to public housing residents is demolition
resulting in displacement. I am sure by now
everyone is aware that HUD has awarded 24
HOPE VI's grants in June, total amount of
$433 million. Nothing has changed
everything remains the same: residents are
still being displaced and or plans are
designed that will result in displacement
and, no true residents participation. I was
recently in Gary Indiana at the request of
ENPHRONT members and a partnering
organization to provide technical support;
with addressing the atrocities which exist
in the proposed HOPE VI environment at the
Housing Authority of Gary Indiana. PART
I FALSE HOPE in Indiana.
The HOPE VI project in Gary, Indiana
according to the housing authority,
represents one of a continuing series of
major efforts undertaken by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) to revitalize areas with severely
distressed public housing throughout the
nation. The City of Gary's public housing
agency, the Housing Authority of the City of
Gary (GHA) initially identified a 60 year
old public housing development at its
Duneland Village site as an area most in
need of the type of comprehensive
revitalization of existing housing stock and
surrounding community promoted by the HUD
HOPE VI grant program. In addition to the
effort to replace the Duneland public
housing stock in the city's east side Miller
neighborhood with a new, mixed-income
housing community; the GHA's HOPE VI
project includes a plan to stimulate housing
and community revitalization for whom
in the city's downtown Jackson Park
neighborhood. After completing what they
call extensive preparatory work on the first
phase of the HOPE VI project, GARY'S HOPE VI
TEAM moved to implement the revitalization
efforts outlined in its plan.
Guess who heads up the HOP VI team,
none other than BLOW THEM UP JOE.
Stay tune for a two part series about
FALSE HOPE in Indiana.
THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF NEEDS. THERE
IS A LARGE GROWING NEED FOR AFFORDABLE
HOUSING.
The need for affordable housing for very
low income Americans has never been
greater. These needs have been communicated
in a variety of reports: the State of the
Nation's Housing, issued by the Harvard
Joint Center for Housing Studies; and
reports on America's housing needs by HUD's
Office of Policy Development and Research,
the National Low Income Housing Coalition
and the the National Housing Conference. It
is claimed that the primary job of Public
Housing Authorities is asset management.
The term asset management in the real estate
field mean that property owners need to
continually review the economics of their
properties, including the project future
income from each property, as well as the
projected future costs associated with
operating, maintaining and (where necessary)
upgrading each property. This topic is the
genesis of the recommendations found in the
Harvard Cost Study. All of the topic
issue's succinctly delineated in this
message from the president, I, believe
starts to spell the end for subsidize
housing, unless we as residents once again
mobilize and fight the growing support to
end affordable housing as we know it. The
problem as I see it is that, we as RESIDENTS
only commit to a movement when there is a
crisis, so for many, movements come and go.
I am from the years where movement is
continuous because for us crisis is
forever.
FY04 VOUCHER FUNDING
HUD's attempt to solve the FY04 voucher
funding problem by providing housing
authorities with $150 million and by making
slight changes to how it determines agencies
funding appears to be another no brainier.
All of us remember in April when HUD
announced a far reaching change in its
policy for funding "Section 8" housing
vouchers. The new HUD policy will result
in many state and local housing agencies
failing to receive sufficient funding to
continue supporting all vouchers now in use.
HUD's new fiscal year 2004 funding policy
which is distinct from an Administration
budget proposal to cut vouchers funding
sharply in in fiscal year 2005 and to covert
the program to a block grant is compelling
state and local housing agencies to
institute cuts in assistance that will cause
significant hardship among low-income
families. I believe this underscore's my
foresight and concern about the END.
(more to come) |